Cars are definitely getting quicker. Even a decade ago, an entry-level compact might take over 10 seconds to get to 60 mph, but today only one new car is that slow. The Mitsubishi Mirage. Read on for the slowest new cars, according to Car and Driver’s test results.
5 – Honda HR-V
Honda’s wildly popular crossover compact starts at $25,100 this year. All trims come with a 1.5-liter I4. With available AWD, you can get anywhere–if you’re patient. With the standard 158 horsepower and 138 lb-ft of torque, don’t expect to get to 60 mph faster than 9.4 seconds.
4 – Subaru Crosstrek
I was a bit surprised to see this one, Subaru does make some quick sports cars after all. And while the high clearance Crosstrek ($25,195) has Subaru’s signature flat-four engine, it is only tuned for 152 horsepower and 145 lb-ft of torque. In tests it struggled to 60 mph in 9.5 seconds.
3 – Nissan Versa
The Versa is Nissan’s entry-level sedan. You can get into one for just $16,680. It has a 1.5-liter I4 engine that makes 122 horsepower and 115 lb-ft of torque. Compared with a CVT transmission, this engine propels the Nissan Versa to 60 mph in 9.5 seconds. Other countries get a Versa with an even smaller engine.
2 – Nissan Kicks
This is essentially the crossover version of the Versa. The two vehicles share a powertrain. At $21,340 you get a healthy 32 square feet of cargo space (with the seats folded flat). But that crossover body has some more wind resistance than the Versa and its time to 60 mph is 9.7 seconds. But what this little Nissan lacks in acceleration, it makes up for with that feisty name. Rumor is that the 2025 model will get a whopping 2.0 liters of displacement.
1 – Mitsubishi Mirage
The Mirage is Mitsubishi’s affordable subcompact hatchback and sedan. In some markets it has just a 1.0-liter I3. Here in the U.S. you get the big engine, the 1.2-liter I3. That makes 78 horsepower and 74 lb-ft of torque propel it to 60 mph in 12.8 seconds. You couldn’t exactly “drive it like you stole it,” so but it’s a steal at its full price: $16,695.
Recent data analysis reveals surprising patterns in driver licensing across the United States, highlighting states with notably low percentages of licensed drivers. New York stands out with only 58% of its residents holding a driver’s license, the lowest nationwide, largely due to the extensive public transportation network in New York City. In stark contrast, Delaware boasts an 85% licensing rate, one of the highest, reflecting its smaller population and possibly different transportation needs.
Texas: A Case Study in Driving Challenges
Texas, a state known for its vast expanses and dependence on car travel, has an unexpectedly low licensing rate of just 62%, placing it second lowest in the country, even trailing behind Hawaii. Despite the necessity of vehicles for transportation across its sprawling cities, Texas also reports some of the most concerning driving records. Forbes Advisor points out that Texas drivers frequently engage in risky behaviors such as drunk and distracted driving, particularly prevalent in major cities like Dallas and Houston.
Societal Shifts and Transportation Dynamics
This analysis also touches on broader social trends affecting transportation, such as the decline in public transit usage in Texas and the younger Texan population’s apparent disinterest in driving. The average age of a Texan is around 35, suggesting a demographic that might be less inclined to traditional car ownership and possibly more open to alternative modes of transport. However, the persistent low rate of licensed drivers paired with poor driving records poses significant questions about mobility and safety in the state. Addressing these issues could potentially improve Texas’s notorious ranking in national driving safety statistics.
In West Palm Beach, a distressing incident occurred when a father left his 3-year-old daughter in an SUV while he shopped at Sam’s Club on 45th Street. The child was left in the vehicle with the engine off for over half an hour, during which the internal temperature soared to a dangerous 117 degrees. Alert shoppers noticed the child in distress and intervened, potentially saving her life.
Heroic Actions of Bystanders
Concerned bystanders quickly acted, unlocking the vehicle to rescue the overheated child from her car seat. Upon discovery, she was visibly suffering—sweating profusely, with flushed, red skin, and crying. The quick response of these Good Samaritans highlights the critical role of community vigilance in preventing tragedies.
Legal Consequences and Public Safety Reminder
The father, 42-year-old Raul Rielo-Fernandez, returned to his vehicle to find emergency services attending to his daughter and was subsequently charged. This incident underscores the rapid danger of vehicular heatstroke, which can escalate within minutes, as noted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Last year, vehicular heatstroke claimed the lives of 29 children nationwide. Police hope this alarming event will remind all drivers to be more cautious, especially with vulnerable passengers who rely on adult care and protection.
Tesla grabbed headlines by showcasing its Cybertruck in a drag race outpacing a Porsche 911, all while towing another 911. This spectacle, circulated in a promotional video last year, positioned the Cybertruck not just as a capable electric vehicle but as a powerful contender against one of the world’s most iconic sports cars. The demonstration aimed to highlight the impressive towing capacity and acceleration of the electric truck.
Reality Check by MotorTrend
MotorTrend, curious about Tesla’s bold assertion, set out to replicate the race to see if the results held up under controlled testing. Despite Tesla’s claim, MotorTrend’s experiments painted a different picture. Their findings revealed that the Cybertruck, even when performing impressively, could not surpass the Porsche 911 in a quarter-mile race, the traditional measure for drag racing.
Analyzing the Performance
Further investigation by MotorTrend and insights from Engineering Explained’s Jason Fenske, who analyzed the race’s parameters, confirmed suspicions. It turned out Tesla had conducted the original race over a 1/8-mile distance—a detail not initially disclosed—likely because the Cybertruck’s performance might not measure up in a standard quarter-mile contest. While the Cybertruck showcases remarkable acceleration, hitting 60 mph in just 2.5 seconds, its real-world performance in traditional drag racing formats may not live up to the hype Tesla has built. This event has sparked discussions about transparency and performance expectations in automotive marketing.
A devastating road mishap left a 64-year-old Traverse City motorcyclist with life-threatening injuries following a collision with an SUV. This distressing event took place on May 15 along Garfield Road, close to 3 Mile Road within the confines of Grand Traverse County’s East Bay Township. Michigan State Police swiftly responded, securing the scene to manage the situation and commence their investigative procedures.
Collision Details
The crash involved an SUV driven by a 79-year-old man from Kalamazoo, who was merging onto Garfield Road from 3 Mile Road and inadvertently entered the motorcycle’s path. The collision forcefully dislodged the rider from his motorbike, urgently requiring medical intervention. Emergency services transported him promptly to Munson Medical Center in Traverse City for critical care.
Investigation and Road Safety Urgency
As the investigation proceeds, authorities are examining all factors, including the possibility of impairment due to alcohol or drugs. The occupants of the SUV, the driver and a 74-year-old passenger, were found to be uninjured. This grave incident serves as a stark reminder of the importance of heightened awareness and stringent safety protocols on our roads, particularly at busy intersections and known problem spots.
In the United States, the legality of keeping a firearm in your vehicle varies significantly by state. As a fundamental right, Americans are entitled to bear arms; however, the specifics of transporting and storing firearms in vehicles require a clear understanding of both state and federal regulations. Misunderstanding these laws can lead to severe legal consequences, including problematic encounters with law enforcement.
State-Specific Regulations on Firearms in Vehicles
Different states have different requirements and restrictions regarding firearm transportation in vehicles. For example, California permits the transportation of firearms in a vehicle provided they are unloaded and securely locked away, such as in the trunk or a locked container. Conversely, Texas allows individuals to carry loaded firearms in their vehicles without the need for them to be concealed. This variability underscores the importance of familiarizing oneself with the laws specific to one’s state of residence.
Risks and Recommendations for Keeping Guns in Vehicles
Owning a firearm designated as a “car gun” or “truck gun” for ease of access while traveling can increase the risk of theft, turning a personal protection tool into a potential criminal asset. Many thefts are opportunistic, spurred by visible gun brand stickers on vehicles, which suggest the presence of a firearm inside. To mitigate risks, it is advisable to avoid leaving firearms in vehicles for prolonged periods and to refrain from using decals that could advertise the presence of guns to potential thieves. This approach not only enhances security but also promotes responsible gun ownership and storage.
Electric Crossover Showdown: Tesla Takes on Hyundai
The Tesla Model Y Performance has long stood as a favorite for enthusiasts seeking a swift, sporty electric crossover. Yet, as the electric vehicle (EV) landscape evolves, Tesla finds itself facing stiff competition from global automakers eager to showcase their prowess. Hyundai steps into the spotlight with its Ioniq 5 N, a track-ready EV complete with simulated gears, engine sounds, and even a drift mode, challenging Tesla’s dominance in high-performance electric crossovers.
Drag Race Dynamics: Comparing Two Electric Titans
Electric vehicles are renowned for their instant torque and thrilling acceleration. The Tesla Model Y Performance delivers with its dual-motor all-wheel-drive system, boasting 530 horsepower and a 0-60 mph time of just 3.5 seconds. Meanwhile, the Hyundai Ioniq 5 N ramps up the competition with 641 horsepower, available through a special boost function, propelling it from 0 to 62 mph in a mere 3.4 seconds. Despite being heavier and more expensive than the Tesla, the Ioniq 5 N’s performance in a straight-line sprint offers a compelling showcase of Hyundai’s advancements in EV technology.
Cost vs. Performance: Is Hyundai Worth the Premium?
In a detailed drag race analysis by Supercharged BG, a Bulgarian YouTube channel, the Hyundai Ioniq 5 N edged out the Tesla with a quarter-mile time of 11.28 seconds at 117 mph, compared to the Model Y’s 12.13 seconds at 112 mph. This performance comes at a cost, however, with the Ioniq 5 N priced significantly higher than the Model Y, even before factoring in potential tax credits available to Tesla buyers. While the Hyundai offers additional features like drift mode, prospective buyers must consider whether these extras justify the $22,000 premium. This comparison not only highlights the raw speed and innovation within the EV market but also underscores the broader economic considerations facing consumers in the rapidly growing sector.
This is the new Peugeot E-3008, an all-electric ‘fastback SUV’ that gives the French manufacturer one of the largest fleets of distinct pure EV models of any manufacturer. Following in the aesthetic footsteps of the larger Peugeot 408, and foreshadowing the even larger Peugeot E-5008, this new model joins the swollen ranks of compact SUVs that now seem to make up the majority of European car sales.
First things first. Somehow, Peugeot has managed to eke a claimed 422-mile range for this machine, an impressive achievement for any contemporary electric car, let alone a mass market, non-luxury name. In the Stellantis pantheon of brands, Peugeot sits squarely in the middle, leaving luxury to Maserati, sports to Alfa Romeo and quirky mass market design to former sister company Citroën.
Visually, the compact – or ‘urban’ – SUV is one of the toughest typologies to whittle into a piece of well-proportioned design. Peugeot has had a decent stab at it, with the E-3008’s rakish rear screen and the way body panels fold and crease and dive beneath elements like the rear lights.
In fact, there are a plenty of visual tricks going on to keep the E-3008 evenly balanced, such as the blacked-out C-pillar, the dark sill detailing that compresses the height of the side elevations, and the multi-layered front end with its mildly triskaphobia-triggering grille. In the ‘Obsession Blue’ paintwork, seen here, we detected a hint of Gallic 1980s elegance.
Inside the Peugeot E-3008
Inside, it’s a different story. For the past few years, Peugeot has been pushing what it calls the Panoramic i-Cockpit. This approach to cabin architecture places the main digital 21-inch display screen above the main body of the dash, a ribbon of information that can be irritatingly bisected by the small steering wheel. A separate touchscreen deals with key functions and favourites, while the gear and drive selector are set in the swooping asymmetric centre.
The trick is to lower the wheel to just above your legs to get an uninterrupted view of the dash, an unconventional driving position that sets the Peugeot apart from its peers and encourages you to drive with a different mindset. It’s less car-like and more futuristic, an impression aided by the punchy electric motor.
The Electric 230 Long range Single Motor model, with its 98kWh battery, is the only specification that’ll get you that headline range (on a warm day with a following wind), but both the Electric 210 (with a single motor at 73kWh battery) and the Electric 320 (with twin motors, all-wheel drive and 73kWh) offer a very respectable 326 miles. All models come with steering wheel paddles to swap between three levels of regenerative braking. Fast charging up to 160kW is available for swift top-ups where available.
Receive our daily digest of inspiration, escapism and design stories from around the world direct to your inbox
Although a petrol-hybrid model will be offered later in the year, Peugeot is issuing a strong signal of intent by releasing the EV model first. It’s a very easy car to live with, relatively compact at just over 4.5m in length, with a cavernous interior aided by fold-flat rear seats.
Peugeots have traditionally been dynamically refined, and the E-3008 is no different, with well-weighted steering that doesn’t feel too light and feathery. The interior is different but not distracting, and the palette and detailing throughout have been pared back to reduce the number of parts and materials required (over 500kg of the car’s mass is made up of ‘green’ materials, including recycled plastic).
Although the E-3008 isn’t the affordable EV of everyone’s dreams – it represents a serious hike in prices from the brand’s usual range – it does its thing differently, with confidence and without compromise. The impressive range is the icing on a well-made cake.
Peugeot E-3008, from £45,850, Peugeot.co.uk, @PeugeotUK
Revisiting Warren Buffett’s Stance on Transportation Investments
Warren Buffett, the renowned investor and leader of Berkshire Hathaway, has long been skeptical about the profitability of the airline and automotive sectors. Despite the transformative impact of these industries on modern society, Buffett’s analysis, dating back to 1999, remains remarkably relevant today. Even as Berkshire once invested in BYD, a leading Chinese electric vehicle manufacturer, they have been gradually reducing their stake, indicating a cautious approach to what many see as a revolutionary market.
Buffett’s Historical Perspective on Automotive and Airline Investments
In a 1999 interview highlighted in a 2014 investment blog, Buffett expressed his reservations about the long-term investment appeal of the automotive and airline industries. He observed that despite the vast number of car manufacturers that existed at the turn of the 20th century, only a few remain today, none of which have been particularly lucrative investments. Similarly, he noted that the airline industry had, up to that point, cumulatively earned zero profit since its inception—a startling statistic that underscores the high-risk nature of these businesses.
The Ongoing Relevance of Buffett’s Insights Amidst Modern Challenges
The enduring wisdom of Buffett’s views is underscored by recent troubles in the transportation sector, such as Tesla’s financial struggles, Boeing’s reputational damage, and significant losses reported by major airlines like Southwest. These issues reflect the inherent volatility and challenges within these industries, reinforcing Buffett’s skepticism about their suitability as long-term investments. As we continue to witness shifts towards electrification and sustainable transport solutions, Buffett’s cautious stance provides a critical lens through which to assess potential opportunities and pitfalls in these historically tumultuous markets.
With the rise of EVs, we’ve talked before about how the word “frunk” is becoming part of our vocabulary, yet while this change is happening there’s another historic shift occurring within the automotive world.
Cars with traditional trunks are disappearing. The Chevy Malibu is the last gasoline-powered American sedan you can buy with one, and it’s going off to live with its SS454 great uncle up in the sky very soon. The shift to crossovers has relegated the traditional trunk-equipped sedan to a small minority of vehicles, and even most of those have such sharp “fastback” rooflines that it’s only a matter of time before they’ll finally end up with the hatchbacks anyone can see they desperately need.
Hot take: I think the sedan has not breathed its last. I do, however, think that in the future it’s going to be very different, and I’m not entirely happy about where I think it might go.
Give ‘Em The Boot
It’s sort of hard to believe how long cars have had trunks. The whole idea seems to date back to cars from a hundred years ago with an added-on box stuck to the rear of the passenger compartment for luggage; car design seemed to just integrate that into the basic form of postwar cars and it just stuck.
From a logical standpoint, a two-box shape vehicle can hold so much more than a three-box, yet there are benefits to a traditional trunk which people still like. Anything you put in there is protected from prying eyes. Smelly wet golf clubs won’t spread their odor into the passenger compartment. Road noise from the rear tires is typically cut down. Your Uber driver can stuff luggage in there without giving you a chill that an open SUV hatch would.
Back in the seventies, hatchbacks were briefly a popular thing until manufacturers released versions of the same cars with traditional trunks that just cleaned up in the sales department. General Motors famously offered hatchback-looking sedans (that weren’t hatchbacks at all) which the public soundly rejected; once they put normal-looking trunks on the back instead sales skyrocketed.
After launching the three-door hatchback, Honda later offered a notchback four door Accord. This thing was an instant, runaway success that dealers marked up to absurd levels; it would ultimately outsell the hatch and push it out of the lineup a decade later.
At about the same time, Volkswagen stuck a trunk onto the back of the world-beating Golf/Rabbit and called it the Jetta. Like the Accord, it eventually put paid to the hatchback models that spawned it.
History doesn’t always repeat itself, but it seems to happen just when you least expect it to, and in ways you wish that it didn’t.
Trunkenstein
Car design seems to be influenced by functional advancements (like aerodynamics) as much as pure aesthetic trends (tailfins, those stupid weird shapes on “C” pillars of current cars) in a desperate effort to be “different”. Sometimes it’s a bit of both. If you look at the way pickups and crossovers are used today, as well as how they tend to appear very similar, that points to a possible odd trajectory in their future.
First, let’s look at most pickups you see on the road today (at least in urban areas). The vast majority keep it classy by having the cargo bed totally covered. At the same time, most crossovers provide a “privacy” roll-out cover that’s almost always closed to hide the contents from passers-by. This all points to a desire for making a more secure area for cargo in these vehicles, but it’s not like you’d make a pickup with a regular trunk in back, right? Who would even think of doing that? Brazil, apparently. Ford trucks in this South American nation were subject to some very bizarre modifications from independent contractors.
From 1979 to the late eighties, Ford of Brazil sold the F-1000; this was essentially a Fifth Generation 1967-72 American Ford F-series reborn with odd attempting-to-look-updated trim details (c0mposite headlights! grey lower cladding! black window trim!). Coachbuilder SR Veículos Especials made this already bizarre machine even stranger by converting it to the F-1000 Deserter SR XK. At first glance, the Deserter looks like an AI image created from typing in the wrong prompts, but it’s a real vehicle. That’s a car-like trunk lid stuck on the back over the short bed.
For whatever reason, they didn’t make one or two Deserters and then had to crush them out of shame. No, they must have found enough takers that later another outside fabricator named Tropical Cabines took a big Ford F-250 truck, chopped the tail, and added a trunk lid and taillights that appear to have been taken off of a Focus sedan. Once again, I don’t know how many Ford F-250 Tropiclassics were actually created, but the answer appears to be “a hell of a lot more than you would think”.
Surprisingly, there were some “trunked” trucks and crossovers sold here in the US many years back, though they didn’t catch on. The funky two-seater Suzuki X-90 featured a trunk, and earlier generations of the Subaru Legacy Outback offered a standard sedan version alongside the much more popular wagon.
Naturally, this was a few decades ago, and much has changed in that time; the term “crossover” didn’t even exist back then. Also, back in the nineties, people would likely find it unthinkable that anyone thirty years later would be drawn to a jacked-up sort-of-truck “coupe” with a fastback for no particular reason, yet here we are. People actually buy these:
Why do people put these strange-looking conveyances in their driveways? My guess is that they’re trying to escape the “station wagon” feel of a typical SUV and somehow appear different. If that’s the case, will trunk-backed crossovers be next? I had to get a glimpse of just how bad this could be. Get ready for some Sport Utility Sedans, or SUS; I can’t think of a more appropriate name in this case.
Trunk In The Junk
We could certainly search for various SUVs or crossovers that might, maybe, lend themselves best to the add-a-trunk treatment. On the other hand, we could just get whatever utes I can find pictures big enough to Photoshop and proceed. Let’s absolutely do the latter.
The Nissan Rogue fits the “average crossover” wallpaper appearance norm pretty well, so it’s a good one to start with. We’ll lower the roof a bit over the tops of the doors, move the rear backlight forward, and somehow try to make this thing work. Taillights have to move down lower on what is now the trunk lid, and I’ve increased rear overhang just slightly.
Whoa, the Toyota Grand Highlander “sedan” looks a bit odd, but then again with that massive grille and blocky fenders, it’s not like you’re ever going to turn it into a Series III XJ6 any time soon. The extra mass of the rear cargo area on the standard Highlander sort of helps balance the heavy front end and…nah, you’d need a two-story building on the back of it to “balance” out that big face. Honestly, the grille-for-days part of this thing is far more objectionable than the roofline ever could be. Woof!
When I think “Buick” I always see a sedan. I know they’re trying desperately to dispel the image of a handicapped tag hanging from the mirror in a Cracker Barrel parking lot, but if there’s any brand that could use cars with trunks it seems like Buicks would be first in line to get fitted with one. Let’s try one of the little sport-utes, the Envision (full disclosure: such is my disinterest that I had to go back to the website twice to remember what these things were called). More overhang, moved the backlight, lowered the roof. I didn’t even move the taillights:
Here the larger (and soon to be replaced) Enclave gets the same treatment; the fender bulges work surprisingly well. I mean, it still looks ridiculous, but better than I expected, like the equivalent of a fender bender and not a near-fatal car wreck.
Yes, I’ll stop now, but you get the idea. I actually spared you from a few that were even worse. You’re welcome.
Get The Trunk Out Ma Face
Years ago, our parents saw someone with slightly flared jeans, and then within months some of them were wearing pants that made them look like elephants. Dynasty came on around your bedtime; your mom watched it religiously and weeks later she was wearing blouses that made her look like an American football player. The quest for the “next big thing” and “being different” can take us in odd directions.
Look, I don’t like this any more than you do, but at some point buyers will hanker for a vehicle that isn’t a five-door SUV or a pickup truck. Minivans were once The Thing To Have but then over time became social albatrosses when they appeared everywhere; it’s easy to believe once-cool “outdoorsy” crossovers and SUVs will do the same thing. The escalating heights of new cars mean they can’t go back to a sedan with traffic towering above them (or so they think), so it’s possible that these odd Frankensteins could become a thing.