Escalating Vandalism at EV Charging Stations: A Nationwide Concern

Rising Incidents of Vandalism

Across the United States, from Texas to California, there has been a surge in vandalism targeting electric vehicle (EV) charging stations. Notably, Tesla Superchargers and various public charging points have been compromised, with incidents involving severed cables and damaged infrastructure reported in cities like Houston and Fresno. These attacks not only cause significant financial losses—often amounting to thousands of dollars for each repair—but also considerable inconvenience for EV owners reliant on these facilities for their transportation needs.

Chargers vandalized in Houston, TX

Motivations and Implications

The motivations behind these acts vary from criminal intentions to harvest copper from the charging cables, a material that fetches a price on the scrap market, to ideological opposition against electric vehicles. This criminal activity disrupts the availability of charging infrastructure, essential for the growing number of EV users, and poses broader questions about the security of critical transportation infrastructure. The frequent targeting of these assets highlights a crucial vulnerability in urban planning and the need for enhanced protective measures.

Chargers vandalized in Sumner, WA
Charger vandalism in Fresno, CA

Preventive Measures and Long-Term Solutions

In response to these challenges, some cities are adopting more robust security measures. For instance, Fresno is installing protective cabinets around charging stations and locking them during off-peak hours to prevent unauthorized access. Additionally, enhancing surveillance around these sites, increasing lighting, and positioning chargers in well-trafficked areas could deter potential vandals. These steps are vital not only to protect the infrastructure but also to reassure the public about the reliability and safety of transitioning to electric vehicles.

The Surge in EV Fast Charging Stations: One for Every 15 Gas Stations

Charging Infrastructure Boom in the U.S.

Despite a slowdown in electric vehicle (EV) sales growth, the expansion of charging infrastructure in the U.S. is accelerating rapidly. Recent data reveals that the country now boasts nearly 8,200 fast-charging stations, providing a notable boost to EV adoption. This increase means there’s approximately one DC fast charging station for every 15 gas stations, marking a significant improvement in accessibility.

How the Charging Landscape is Evolving

Charging deserts are becoming a thing of the past as thousands of new DC fast chargers are activated across the country. The growth is driven by initiatives like the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Program (NEVI), supported by $5 billion from the Biden administration. Additionally, major convenience store chains are enhancing their locations with EV chargers, meeting consumer expectations for amenities such as restrooms, Wi-Fi, and refreshments during charging stops.

Electrify America Flagship Indoor Charging Station In San Francisco, California

The Future of EV Charging

The ongoing investment and advancements in charging infrastructure promise to make finding a charger easier and more convenient. Google’s AI-enhanced Maps will help drivers locate chargers more efficiently, while research suggests that public charging revenue could reach $127 billion globally by 2030. This expansion not only addresses the issue of charging deserts but also enhances the overall EV ownership experience.

Top Tips for Finding the Best Electric Vehicle Charging Stations from Expert Reviewer ‘Ubiquitous Electric Bill’

Finding Reliable EV Charging Stations

Electric vehicle (EV) charging stations vary widely in quality and convenience. Some offer free or affordable charging options, while others are poorly maintained or out of service. To ensure a smooth experience, EV drivers should seek out well-lit locations with functional chargers.

Expert Advice from Bill Gehn

Bill Gehn, known online as “The Ubiquitous Electric Bill,” has reviewed nearly 2,100 charging stations to help drivers find the best spots. His reviews highlight fast chargers at freeway exits and gas stations as top choices, offering insights on where to charge efficiently. Gehn’s journey with EVs began in 2015 and has since expanded as he continues to share valuable information on Plugshare.com and its app.

Practical Insights and Recommendations

Gehn’s thorough evaluations consider the type of charger, cost, and safety, aiming to alleviate “range anxiety” for EV owners. His reviews, including over 50 updates in the past month alone, guide drivers to reliable stations and help avoid those with potential issues. His dedication is recognized by Plugshare, which recently honored him with a branded baseball cap as a token of appreciation for his contributions.

Chicago’s EV Charging Crisis: A Deep Dive into the Factors Affecting Electric Vehicle Infrastructure

Complex Challenges in Chicago’s EV Charging Network

Chicago recently faced significant issues with its electric vehicle (EV) charging stations, highlighted by incidents of Teslas and other EVs being unable to charge due to extreme cold. Kyle Conner from Out of Spec Reviews embarked on a firsthand investigation in Chicago to unravel the complications affecting the city’s charging infrastructure. He discovered multiple failures not just limited to one provider, but across various networks including Tesla, Electrify America (EA), and EVgo.

Operational Setbacks Across Major Charging Networks

Tesla Superchargers initially faced outages but were largely operational shortly after, thanks to rapid response efforts. However, newer Electrify America stations, despite promises of enhanced reliability, were disproportionately affected by the cold, with many remaining offline for days. EVgo also struggled, with only a few chargers resuming service through remote interventions. This scenario underscored the broader reliability challenges that extreme weather poses to current EV charging technologies.


Impact of Rideshare Operations on Public Charging Stations

The influx of EVs from rideshare drivers, predominantly from Uber and Lyft, exacerbated the strain on Chicago’s charging stations. These vehicles, often rented and used for short, frequent trips, rarely reached optimal battery temperatures, complicating the charging process. Misunderstandings among rideshare drivers about EV operations, especially regarding the preconditioning needs of batteries in cold weather, further intensified the city’s charging woes.

Educational Gaps and Operational Insights

Many drivers were unaware that EVs might require significant time to precondition batteries before charging can commence effectively in cold conditions. Such gaps in user knowledge suggest a need for better education on EV maintenance and operation, particularly for rideshare drivers. Kyle’s observations also highlighted the variability in preconditioning efficiency across different EV models, which can critically impact performance in freezing temperatures.


Broader Implications and Solutions for EV Infrastructure

The ordeal of a rideshare driver who endured a three-day wait to charge a Chevy Bolt illustrates the severe impact of inadequate charging infrastructure on individuals’ livelihoods. The incident calls for rideshare companies to consider establishing dedicated charging solutions to support their drivers reliably. This approach, along with improving the robustness of public charging networks, will be essential as cities like Chicago move towards broader EV adoption amidst challenging weather conditions.

This Startup Wants Keep Your City Streets From Being A Mess Of EV Charging Wires

New York-based itselectric is rolling out a clever plan for urban Level 2 charging that could solve several problems at once

“Nobody drives in New York City. There’s too much traffic.” Cliché as that joke is, the truth is that New York’s streets and parking garages are full of more than 2 million registered cars, with countless more coming in and out daily from New Jersey, Connecticut and other places.

Even with efforts to improve public transit and make more car-free spaces, those vehicles probably aren’t going anywhere for a long time. Now, imagine a future where most—if not all—of those cars are electric. Where, and how, will they stay charged? Right now, about 42,000 EVs are registered in New York City (not counting the ones parked in the city that are registered elsewhere) but like EVs everywhere, that number is growing quickly.

Brooklyn-based startup itselectric has one potential solution to this problem: curbside EV chargers that draw electricity from spare capacity in residential and commercial buildings, and supply power to cars via detachable cables that drivers take with them. The chargers themselves are discreet, sleek-looking silver posts placed close to the curb, and they don’t need the bulky frames seen on other streetside options.

In theory, this keeps New York from becoming a kind of hellscape of charging wires for cars everywhere, interfering with sidewalks and bike lanes. The program allows property owners to generate income—estimated at up to $1,000 per year—by “selling” their electricity to drivers. And it’s an aggressive, innovative approach to a known problem that so far has very few solutions: how to keep EV drivers charged up if they don’t have access to a home garage or even chargers at an apartment complex parking lot. (And it keeps people from running 100-foot extension cords out of their windows to charge their EVs, a sight that’s not terribly uncommon in Brooklyn these days.)

“I hate to say it, but generally speaking, urban solutions are often ones that are not the ones that are in front of the line,” itselectric co-founder Tiya Gordon told InsideEVs recently. “It should be as easy as it is when you go home and plug in your car at night in your garage, but the exact thing on the street.”

Itselectric was founded by Gordon, a veteran of the design industry, and her husband Nathan King, an architect who specializes in sustainability and urban projects. Their idea has been making waves as of late. The nascent company has already struck up a partnership with the New York City Economic Development Corporation and Hyundai Cradle, the Korean automaker’s venture capital and startup investment arm. This year, it closed on a $2.2 million pre-seed round of funding, set up six pilot chargers at an old bank building in the Brooklyn Army Terminal in Sunset Park, recently won a “2023 Next Big Things in Tech for Sustainability” award from the publication Fast Company, and has and big expansion plans for 2024. They’ve gone from countless rejections to a waiting list for streetside chargers in the hundreds.

“A year ago, in November 2022, we were still in this phase of cold calling cities and saying, ‘Hey, have you heard of this thing called curbside charging?’” Gordon said, “Now we’re responding to inbound [requests from cities] that are that are specifically looking for not only curbside charging, but for innovation in curbside charging.”

How It Works

The installation of an itselectric curbside charger comes at no cost to the property owner; the startup covers that. The chargers plug directly into the building’s existing electrical connections and run off spare electricity; “We don’t even have to connect to the utility,” Gordon said, because these are slower Level 2 chargers designed for everyday parking and overnight use. And a property owner can earn passive income by “selling” electricity to EV owners.

For the drivers’ part, they’re issued a cord they carry in their vehicles with them, an idea that’s already common in Europe but has yet to make real inroads into the U.S. They download an app, get a cable—a kind of curlycue design to not take up more space than is necessary—and pay to charge as needed. Tesla drivers are issued a NACS cable and all other automakers get a CCS one, but Gordon sees NACS cables being for “everyone” as that plug increasingly becomes the standard for U.S. charging. “It just makes sense. Carry the cable you need and just plug into a universal socket,” she said.

Drivers pay for the energy used in kilowatt-hours, Gordon said. “We set that for each city based on what the utility base rate is; every city, of course, is different,” she said. The goal is to provide drivers with “convenient, on or close to their block, charging that is affordable [and] far less the cost of further afield DC-based chargers.”

Gordon said the decision to be a Level 2-only company was both a pragmatic one and a necessary one. With slower Level 2 chargers, EV drivers can typically charge overnight or just add electrons during short- or medium-length parking stops. So far, Gordon said, much of the focus on growing the charging infrastructure has been around DC public fast chargers to enable road trips and longer-distance travel.

This is despite the Biden Administration saying that of the 1.2 million public chargers expected by 2030, a staggering 1 million of those are expected to be Level 2 chargers. “How do we get a million chargers in the ground in seven years?” Gordon said. “Currently, the country has 126,000 Level 2 chargers, most of them probably broken, right? So we need speed and scale to get there.”

itselectric founders Gordon and King.

Level 2 charging is especially necessary in places like New York, where the vast majority of residents lack access to the home charging options that single-family homeowners can enjoy. And while companies like the ride-hail startup Revel are adding a growing number of DC fast chargers in and around New York, EV drivers will need more of both types of charging, and perhaps more Level 2 charging than they think.

“It’s not a scalable solution,” Gordon said of urban DC fast chargers. “Any four-stall DC fast charger uses as much energy as a 300-unit building in a month. We often say we’re Team Level 2, because it’s the most obvious solution to meet our immediate charging needs in the next 10 years for this transition.” Gordon said their solution is cheaper to build, quicker and easier to install and uses far less power overall. Additionally, she said, “we are not constrained by [needing to make] an inter-utility connection, which is definitely dictated by the utility. We can literally go anywhere where there’s a building and a curb.”

What’s Next

America has a lot of buildings, a lot of curbs and a growing number of EV drivers who need charging options. As a result, itselectric seems eager to branch out beyond New York. The company recently unveiled 25 more chargers coming soon to several properties in Detroit.

For the Motor City, the startup has already secured grants from DTE Energy and the Michigan Office of Future Mobility and Electrification. Gordon added that eight additional cities are on the roadmap for 2024, and other municipalities are putting out requests for charging project proposals that seem tailor-made to what they’re doing. (Itselectric isn’t yet disclosing which cities it plans to deploy chargers in next.)

While some questions remain over the economics involved if certain electric connection projects get especially difficult, itselectric seems to be onto something as more and more cars in New York—and soon, other big cities—go electric. Part of their challenge will be convincing more investors to look to Level 2 charging instead of DC fast charging, but Gordon said she thinks that puts itselectric in a unique position to capitalize on a market that’s necessary but underserved.

“We’re in a niche space,” Gordon said. “But no one’s touching this space that we’re looking at.”

Rivian’s Exclusive Offer: Free Wall Charger and $2,000 Installation Credit with R1T Purchase

Limited-Time Offer for Rivian R1T Buyers

Rivian is enhancing its appeal for customers interested in its R1T pickup truck by offering a complimentary Level 2 wall charger along with a $2,000 installation credit. This promotion, which is available only for vehicles from inventory and through Rivian’s installation partner Qmerit, is valid until the end of the year. The fast delivery of inventory vehicles—typically within one to six weeks—makes this an attractive alternative to the custom build wait time of about four months.

Exceptional Value and Convenience

The free wall charger, valued at $800, supports fast charging with up to 11.5 kilowatts and a 24-foot cable, providing up to 25 miles of range per hour for the R1T. With the $2,000 installation credit, Rivian significantly reduces the initial setup cost, though any additional expenses beyond this credit will be the owner’s responsibility. This package, totaling approximately $2,800, offers substantial savings and convenience, similar to Hyundai’s earlier offer but with greater value for Rivian customers.

Wall Street Journal Review Exposes Flaws in Non-Tesla Fast Charging Network

Challenges in Non-Tesla EV Charging

The Wall Street Journal’s recent testing of 126 non-Tesla DC fast chargers highlighted significant user experience problems, primarily involving payment and connectivity issues. These complications made the charging process less efficient and more frustrating for electric vehicle (EV) owners. Such findings underscore the necessity for standardized solutions in the EV infrastructure to improve reliability and user satisfaction.

The Need for Improved EV Charging Infrastructure

The review conducted by the Wall Street Journal reveals that the current state of non-Tesla EV charging stations is often marked by technical glitches that can deter the broader adoption of electric vehicles. Enhancing the compatibility and ease of use of these chargers is crucial as the demand for electric vehicles continues to grow. It is imperative for industry stakeholders to address these issues promptly to ensure that EV owners have access to dependable and user-friendly charging options.

Enhancing User Experience at EV Charging Stations

To foster a more positive EV charging experience, improvements must be made in both hardware and software components of charging stations. Operators should focus on streamlining the payment process and ensuring robust connectivity during the charging session. Moving forward, adopting more uniform standards across the network could alleviate many of the current pain points, ultimately leading to higher satisfaction and increased EV adoption rates.

Texas Again Delays Vote On Tying EV Charging Funds To Tesla’s NACS

Texas has reportedly delayed a vote on grants of federal funds to build EV chargers to August 16 after several charging companies protested the plan to include Tesla’s NACS connector in charging stations.

A Reuters report cited three unnamed sources who claimed the vote was postponed because of the pushback from EV charging companies.

Texas’ department of transportation confirmed that the issue was removed from the agency’s July agenda “at the discretion of the commissioners,” adding that the agenda for the August meeting had not been finalized. The vote in Texas could be key as it could influence other states to do the same.

On June 21, Texas announced plans to mandate EV charging companies to include Tesla’s North American Charging Standard (NACS) alongside the US standard Combined Charging System (CCS) if they wanted access to federal funds as part of a program to electrify highways.

However, days later, EV charger makers and operators including ChargePoint, FLO, ABB, FreeWire, and EVBox, criticized the plan, calling it “premature.”

In a letter to Texas Transportation Commission’s chairman, the companies said more time was needed to test the interoperability of Tesla’s connectors with the CCS standard.

Before the latest postponement, the vote had already been delayed once to July 11 from June 29 after members of Texas’ transport commission, including the chairman, said they wanted to understand NACS and its implications before voting on the issue.

“We do think the reason why this decision is being punted is there is reaction within the industry that this is a big announcement and let’s just do this responsibly,” an unnamed executive from an EV charging company told Reuters.

The same source said that “Texas is a bit of a bulwark” and what Texas does “sets a precedent for other state transport departments.” So far, Washington state has talked about similar plans and Kentucky has mandated that EV charging companies include Tesla’s plug.

The federal funds for EV charging stations require charging companies to offer CCS, but plans to adopt Tesla’s NACS connector by Ford and General Motors have prompted other carmakers and charging companies to embrace the technology.