Ford Explorer vs. Nissan Pathfinder: Which 2024 Model Takes the Lead?

Comparative Performance of the 2024 Models

In the competitive arena of midsize SUVs, both the 2024 Ford Explorer and Nissan Pathfinder offer robust capabilities. However, the Ford Explorer edges out with superior power and agility. It boasts a turbocharged 2.3-liter engine delivering 300 horsepower and 310 lb-ft of torque. Enhanced by a 10-speed transmission and available in both rear-wheel and all-wheel drive, the Explorer is designed for dynamic driving experiences. On the other hand, the Pathfinder’s 3.5-liter V6 engine, while respectable, produces 284 horsepower and 259 lb-ft of torque, coupled with a nine-speed transmission available in front-wheel and 4WD configurations.

Interior Space and Technology Features

When it comes to interior amenities and space, the Ford Explorer also surpasses the Nissan Pathfinder. The Explorer not only offers advanced technology with its optional 10.1-inch vertical touchscreen but also prioritizes passenger comfort with more generous rear seating space. In contrast, the Pathfinder features an 8-inch touchscreen standard, with an upgrade option to a 9-inch on higher trims. While the Pathfinder provides ample space upfront, it falls short in rear passenger and cargo space compared to the Explorer, which offers up to 87.8 cubic feet of cargo space, against the Pathfinder’s 80.5 cubic feet.

Towing Capacity and Overall Value

Although the Nissan Pathfinder leads slightly in towing capacity, allowing up to 6,000 pounds compared to the Explorer’s 5,600 pounds, this advantage might not compensate for its performance and space limitations for many buyers. Both vehicles are competitively priced, with the Explorer starting at $36,860 and the Pathfinder closely behind at $36,650. This pricing, coupled with the Explorer’s performance and space advantages, might sway buyers towards the Ford model, especially those prioritizing a more robust driving experience and greater utility.

Seeking a Classier Alternative to a Ford Mustang? Explore These GT Cars

 

Introduction to GT Cars

GT cars seamlessly blend practicality with style, offering a refined alternative to the robust Ford Mustang. While the Mustang is often celebrated for its grand touring credentials, including a spacious trunk, comfortable cabin, rear seats, powerful front-mounted engine, and rear-wheel drive, some luxury-focused travelers might seek a more prestigious badge. Fortunately, several posh grand tourers can fulfill this desire without significantly exceeding the cost of a new Mustang.

Affordable Luxury GT Alternatives

For those desiring a luxury grand tourer without a hefty price tag, several excellent options are available:

BMW 4 Series (F32 Generation) The F32 BMW 4 Series coupe is a solid alternative to the Mustang. While the 435i trim’s 300-horsepower 3.0L inline six-cylinder may not match the Mustang GT’s 480-horsepower 5.0L V8, its 4.5-second sprint to 60 mph ensures an exhilarating drive. Additionally, a 2015 BMW 435i xDrive is valued at around $17,000, making it an affordable choice.

Audi S5 (B8 Generation) The pre-2012 B8 Audi S5 features a naturally aspirated 4.2L FSI V8, providing a throaty V8 experience akin to the Mustang. With 354 horsepower and a price well under $15,000, the B8 S5 stands out as a cost-effective yet powerful alternative.

A Jaguar XK from the X150 generation shows off its GT car fascia.
An X150 Jaguar XK | National Motor Museum, Heritage Images via Getty Images

Opulent GT Choices

For those willing to invest a bit more, these grand tourers offer unmatched luxury and performance:

Jaguar XK (X150 Generation) The X150 Jaguar XK is perhaps the epitome of opulence, boasting a 4.2L V8 engine, with a supercharged variant available. Although it lacks a manual transmission, the post-facelift models feature 5.0L engines similar to those in Mustang GTs, combining power with elegance.

Maserati GranTurismo For the bold, the first-generation Maserati GranTurismo offers a thrilling drive with its 454-horsepower V8 and iconic trident badge. While maintenance costs can be high, the allure of owning a Maserati for less than the price of a new Mustang GT is undeniable.

Conclusion

While the Ford Mustang remains a strong contender in the GT segment, these alternatives offer luxury and performance for discerning drivers. Whether it’s the affordable elegance of the BMW 4 Series, the robust Audi S5, the luxurious Jaguar XK, or the daring Maserati GranTurismo, there’s a grand tourer to suit every taste and budget. Share your thoughts in the comments below on which GT car you’d choose as your classy Mustang alternative.

Best Ford Thunderbird Cars from the 80s to the Early 2000s

The Best of Ford Thunderbird: Celebrating Iconic Models from the 80s to the Early 2000s

Ford’s Thunderbird, introduced in 1955, quickly became an emblem of stylish performance and luxury. With a blend of muscle and elegance, the Thunderbird has evolved over the decades. Here, we spotlight the most notable T-Bird models from the 80s to the early 2000s, focusing on their unique features and enduring appeal.

1984 Ford Thunderbird Turbo Coupe: A Performance Shift

Greg Gjerdingen/Wikipedia

Breaking from its luxury-focused predecessors, the 1984 Turbo Coupe emphasized performance with a turbocharged 2.3L four-cylinder engine delivering 142 HP. Its sporty design, complemented by Goodyear Eagle tires and an aerodynamic suspension system, marked a significant shift for the Thunderbird line. This model set the stage for a new era of high-performance Thunderbirds.

1988 Ford Thunderbird Turbo Coupe: Enhancing the Turbo Legacy

TKOIII/Wikipedia

Building on the success of the earlier Turbo Coupe, the 1988 model featured an upgraded turbocharged 2.3L engine, now producing 190 HP. Improved suspension and handling made it a standout performer of its time. Despite its brief run, the 1988 Turbo Coupe left a lasting legacy as a high-performance icon.

1989 Ford Thunderbird Super Coupe: Luxury Meets Muscle

Greg Gjerdingen/Wikipedia

The 1989 Super Coupe blended luxury with muscle, boasting a supercharged 3.8L V6 engine that produced 230 HP. Modern features like automatic seatbelts, upgraded anti-lock brakes, and electronically controlled rear suspension added to its appeal. This model demonstrated Ford’s commitment to combining comfort with high performance.

2002 Ford Thunderbird: A Modern Revival

Kevauto/Wikipedia

Reviving the legendary nameplate, the 2002 Thunderbird featured a two-seat convertible design that paid homage to its classic predecessors. Despite its nostalgic appeal, the model struggled with low sales, leading to its discontinuation in 2005. Nevertheless, it remains a notable chapter in the Thunderbird’s storied history.


Classic Inspirations: The Roots of Modern Thunderbirds

While newer models made their mark, classic Thunderbirds like the 1955 and 1957 editions laid the foundation for the brand’s success. The 1955 Thunderbird introduced a blend of luxury and sportiness, while the 1957 E-Code model, with its supercharged V8 engine, exemplified peak performance. These classics continue to inspire Thunderbird enthusiasts and collectors alike.


Additional Information and Benefits:

Performance and Design Evolution: Over the decades, the Ford Thunderbird has continually evolved, balancing performance upgrades with cutting-edge design. Each model reflects Ford’s dedication to innovation and customer satisfaction.

Collector’s Appeal: Many Thunderbird models, especially the limited editions and high-performance variants, are highly sought after by collectors. Their blend of historical significance and engineering excellence ensures their lasting appeal in the automotive world.

The Thunderbird’s legacy, marked by these standout models, highlights Ford’s ability to adapt and innovate, keeping the spirit of the T-Bird alive for generations of car enthusiasts.

Ford Dominates List with Five Models Among America’s Most Recalled Vehicles

Ford’s Recall Frequency: A Closer Look at Consumer Impact

Owning a Ford F-150, America’s best-selling vehicle, often entails more visits to the dealership due to safety recalls—a scenario familiar to many Ford owners. The Ford Maverick experiences even higher recall rates, placing both models among the most frequently recalled vehicles in the nation. This frequent recall rate extends to other models in the Ford lineup, highlighting a broader issue within the brand.

Analyzing the Recall Data: Ford’s Position in the Market

According to a recent analysis by iSeeCars, five Ford models rank among the top 25 vehicles for safety recalls. These models include the Ford Maverick, F-150, Bronco, Bronco Sport, and Explorer. For instance, the Ford Maverick ranks eleventh with an anticipated 20.7 recalls over a 30-year lifespan, significantly higher than the median of 3.2 across all models.

The Recall Paradox: Convenience vs. Safety

While frequent recalls can be seen as a proactive measure by a manufacturer to ensure vehicle safety, they also bring inconvenience and potential distrust among consumers. Karl Brauer from iSeeCars points out that while addressing safety issues is crucial, consumers naturally prefer vehicles that don’t require frequent dealership visits. The process, though covered under warranty, costs owners something more valuable: their time.


Additional Insights: The Spectrum of Vehicle Recalls

Comparative Analysis: The Ford F-150, despite its high recall frequency, fares better than its competitors, the Ram 1500 Classic and Ram 1500, which exhibit even higher recall rates. For example, the Ram 1500 Classic experiences 19.3 expected recalls over 30 years, underscoring that this issue affects other major brands as well.

Industry-Wide Perspectives: At the extreme end of the spectrum, Porsche’s Taycan leads as the most recalled vehicle, projected at 70.7 times over its lifetime. In stark contrast, the MINI Convertible exemplifies reliability with a projection of only 0.2 recalls in its lifetime, illustrating the vast differences in recall rates across different models and manufacturers.

Choosing Wisely to Avoid Recall Hassles: For buyers looking to minimize their exposure to recalls, selecting a model with a low historical recall rate is advisable. Vehicles like the Lexus RX 450h and the MINI Convertible offer more assurance of a recall-free ownership experience, enhancing both satisfaction and long-term value.

This detailed look into recall frequencies not only informs potential buyers but also prompts manufacturers to prioritize reliability and customer satisfaction in their future models.

Ford SUV Found Submerged in Goose Lake, Investigation Underway

Emergency Response at Goose Lake

Early in the morning on May 9th, the Ramsey County Sheriff’s Office was alerted to a vehicle submerged in Goose Lake, located at the intersection of White Bear Avenue and South Shore Blvd. The Water Patrol unit swiftly arrived at the scene to assess the situation. They discovered an unoccupied Ford SUV deep in the waters, with no sign of the driver nearby.

Investigation into the Submerged Vehicle

Upon further investigation, deputies reached out to the registered owner of the submerged SUV. The owner reported that he believed his vehicle had been stolen, adding another layer of complexity to the case. As of now, no suspects have been apprehended, and the circumstances surrounding how the SUV ended up in Goose Lake remain unclear.

Ongoing Case Developments

The incident has sparked a full investigation by local authorities, who are working to uncover details and potential leads. The case is still active, with law enforcement exploring various avenues to ascertain the sequence of events that led to the vehicle’s unexpected plunge. Community members are urged to come forward with any information that might assist in solving this perplexing case.


Additional Context and Safety Reminders:

Vehicle thefts can lead to dangerous situations, as demonstrated by the unexpected discovery of the submerged SUV. Vehicle owners are encouraged to take preventative measures to secure their vehicles. The community is reminded of the importance of reporting suspicious activities immediately to prevent similar incidents and aid in prompt law enforcement response.

$59,990 Ford Mustang Mach-E Rally Has ‘Serious Performance On Dirt Roads’

This Mach-E variant has taller suspension and rally tires, and Ford says it can go sideways around a gravel road.

For the past two years, Ford has been developing a rally-inspired version of the Mustang Mach-E, specially designed to be great around a gravel track. The Ford Mustang Mach-E Rally has taller suspension, special wheels, and calibration, making it a unique proposition in the crowded electric crossover segment with its blend of performance and off-road ability.

This rally-inspired Mach-E is not a one-off special but a variant of the model that you can buy starting at $59,995. It comes with the 91-kilowatt-hour extended-range battery pack, but the EPA range drops from 280 miles to 265 miles because of the rally modifications.

The Mach-E for rally enthusiasts

While there is a wide selection of performance electric crossovers to rival the Ford Mustang Mach-E, the new Rally variant is a one-of-a-kind proposition in the segment.

Dual-motor all-wheel drive is standard, and it has a combined power output of 480 horsepower, just like the GT variant. However, it has 100 more pound-feet of torque (or 66 lb-ft more than the GT Performance), for a total of 700 lb-ft. This helps it complete the dash from 0 to 60 mph in 3.4 seconds (four-tenths less than the Mach-E GT).

Other Mach-E Rally modifications include a one-inch suspension lift, special tuning for the adaptive dampers and a set of 19-inch white wheels with Michelin CrossClimate2 all-season tires. Ford says the new suspension tuning should ensure a smooth ride over rough roads and the upgraded Brembo front brakes should help instill additional confidence while driving on a loose surface.

It also gets underbody protection, which should shield the battery pack and other vulnerable parts of the underbelly from rocks. It won’t be hard to tell the Rally apart from other Mach-Es with its special grille with integrated fog lights, a different rear spoiler, and a black roof complimented by black stripes on the hood and decklid.

Another addition unique to the Mach-E Rally is the RallySport driving mode, which is the one you want to be in when the tarmac runs out. The best part about it is that it allows the car to slide around a lot more, and it also changes accelerator pedal response to improve control—this could be the most fun Mach-E variant released so far.

You can order the Mach-E Rally with six available paint colors, but the most attention-grabbing is Grabber Yellow. These photos were taken while Ford was still testing the model, which is why the vehicle is quite dirty in all of them. It does look pretty good covered in all that dirt, though, and it looks like Ford’s engineers had a lot of fun testing it in the dirt.

The Ford Maverick Is A Great Vehicle, But Is It A Great Truck? I Tried It And Know How To Make It Better

I don’t usually think of the Ford Maverick as a truck. That’s not a slight; in fact, it’s a compliment, because what I do think of it as is a very capable and affordable do-anything sort of vehicle. The idea of the Maverick excites me the most when I think of it in its cheapest hybrid form ($25,315), because it is an inexpensive five-seater, four-door vehicle that gets 37 combined mpg and has out back what you could treat as, with a tonneau cover, a massive trunk or, open, a usable if short truck bed. It’s a Swiss Army knife sort of machine, something you could take into almost any unknown situation and find that you’re pretty well equipped to handle whatever happens. It’s a vehicle I happily recommend to people who want something inexpensive and useful for a huge variety of use cases. Deep down, though, I think it still is a truck, fundamentally, or at least wants to be, so I figured it was time to do a sort of review on the Maverick that’s a bit more focused. Specifically, how is it at doing, you know, truck stuff?

What do I mean by truck stuff? Great question, disembodied voice; help yourself to some canapés. I think for this test there are two basic defining truck things I want to focus on, two of the most utilitarian things that also tend to be the two things that people who don’t own trucks tend to ask people who do own trucks to loan them those trucks to do: move items that are not the sorts of things you’d want in the interior of your normal car and move huge items that simply won’t fit in your normal car.

These also happen to be the two categories of tasks that I tend to do when I use my own truck, the 1989 Ford F-150 David got for me a while ago, and it is very much A Truck, and it has a name, The Marshal:

I often use The Marshal to haul crap and tree limbs and other forgotten detritus to the dump, and I often use it to haul my advanced personal watercraft to the lake, the HMS Terror:

Cs Terror Okuda Cs Hmsterror 2

Yes, it’s my shitty canoe. It’s probably worth noting that I used to haul my shitty canoe to the lake on the roof of my Nissan Pao:

Pao Canoe

…so technically you don’t actually need a truck to do this, but the process of getting the canoe on the Pao’s roof and tying it down and then stashing all the lifejackets and other gear was all kind of a colossal ass-pain, and just shoving the thing in the bed of the F-150 has made life vastly easier.

Img 9997 Large

I suppose I should mention that the Maverick that was kindly loaned to me was a Tremor edition one. Well, to be even more specific, the one loaned to me was the most expensive Lariat trim level, with the 2-liter Ecoboost engine making 250 horsepower/277 lb-ft of torque, bolted to an eight-speed automatic, and with the Tremor package that gives “advanced” AWD and a one-inch lift with slightly better breakover, departure, and approach angles, along with better tires and a bunch of decals, all for an extra $3,495.

Img 9994 Large

I really don’t care about the Tremor package in the context of this review. The name never fails to make me picture old people with very shaky hands, or perhaps a mild earthquake, and, really, if intense off-roading was my goal, I don’t think this is the vehicle I’d choose, Tremor-ized or not. From what I’ve read, it does just fine for mild off-road use, but if you want a rock climber or a serious off-roader, this really isn’t it.

I do like the bits of orange trim the Tremor package adds, though, like in the grille bar that incorporates the turn indicators and the tow hooks:

Img 9998 Large

Beyond that, though, for the purposes of what we’re discussing today, we can ignore all the Tremor stuff; this review is valid for any Maverick.

Okay, so let’s get to it, and see how it does with our two key truck tasks!

Task One: Hauling Crap You Don’t Really Want Inside Your Car

Img 0016 Large

There’s two main categories of crap you don’t really want inside your car: crap that is filthy in some way, or crap that is destructive in some way. In the filthy category, this can include brush or tree limbs or gravel or mulch or 140 pounds of creamed sturgeon, unbagged, or trash or whatever. Anything that would normally require you to, if you had it in your trunk or SUV, spend too much time with a vacuum and some paper towels getting everything decent again.

The other category is stuff that, if shoved in the trunk or back of your SUV, would tear up headliners and seats and carpet. The stuff I decided to haul to test fits into this category.

I have a roughly 9-month old puppy who is almost as big a full-grown dog named Juno. Juno is half Husky and half Australian Shepherd, a pretty intimidating combination for someone like me who is more used to dogs that are sweetly and pleasingly stupid. Juno is both smart, and, because she is still a puppy, a dummy.

Juno1

She’s very sweet, but she makes some really terrible decisions, and because she’s surprisingly clever, can usually make those terrible decisions happen. The most common of these is figuring out ways to escape the house and yard. I’m pretty sure I saw her working a combination lock at one point.

Anyway, I needed to shore up some fencing in her backyard romp-about area, so I went to Tractor Supply Company (who should just become a damn sponsor for us by now) to get a big roll of fencing and metal fence posts. These are heavy, bulky things with sharp, scrapey edges that would turn upholstery and carpet into a shredded mess that looked like a few cats got drunk and started to discuss politics, and things ended in pawticuffs and clawticuffs.

Img 0015 Large

In this context, the Maverick did just fine, despite the short bed, because even if the bed is short, it’s still well-designed, and the bedliner material is rugged and effective at taking abuse. Those posts had to go in diagonally, which was fine, and the plastic edging on the lip of the bedsides proved useful as well, doing a good job of protecting the paint.

Img 0026 Large

The bed has a number of considerations taken to help maximize the available space. The humps over the wheels are both squared-off to allow things to be placed on top of them easily, and there’s notches in there to accommodate a 2×4 laid side-to-side to act as a sort of shelf. If you’re hauling long sheets of plywood, the tailgate is designed to be propped at an angle to keep the sheets nicely level.

Bedstuff 1

So, yes, it’s a short bed, but it’s thoughtfully designed and has a nice, tough liner, which makes it generally quite good at the basic truck function of hauling sloppy or destructive things. The bed also has a couple nice convenience features like a panel with a light and a standard 120V wall-type power outlet connected to a DC-to-AV inverter, and another cubbyhole that can store things and has a 12V power pigtail right next to it so you could use it for something that needs power, like a compressor or margarita maker.

Img 0009 Large

Here’s the compartment, and the 12V leads are in that little panel to the right:Img 0008 Large

The Maverick works pretty well as a truck for the hauling messy/damaging things function, and that’s a very common truck use. You may not be able to get the volume you’d get with a full-sized bed, but for many people’s demands for this kind of thing, the Maverick can pull it off just fine.

Before I get into the second Truck Use, there’s two interior details I want to point out. First, these door handles:

Img 0048 Large

I don’t mind them at all, but a number of people who got in the truck were baffled by or just uncomfortable with their use. I think the open-endedness is just not what many people expect out of an interior doorhandle/armrest? Again, it didn’t bother me, but some passengers were really off-put by them.

This next one, though, did bother me:

Img 0024 Large

This rotary shifter is dumb. It just wastes space. If there was ever a good context for putting a column shifter on a car, this is it. Stick the PRNDL on the column, and free up all that space for another cubbyhole or something, anything. It’s just silly.

Okay, back to Truck Things!

Task Two: Hauling Really Big Things

Img 0034 Large

Alright, now we get to the tricky part, hauling the HMS Terror. The Terror is not a particularly long canoe, I think it’s about 12 feet long, but a 12-foot long object is still a very long object to move around. I mean, it’s two six-foot party subs, just less tasty but more water-tight. The Maverick’s five-foot-something long bed is less than half the length of the canoe, so it’s not exactly ideal.

Cs Marshal Canoe

Normally, in my old F-150, the canoe fits mostly in the bed and rests propped up against the tailgate, sticking out maybe a foot or so, not much at all. I don’t need to tie it down, because there’s no way it’s just going to fly out of the bed, since 90% of it is fully within the bed as it is. With the Maverick, it’s a very different story.

Img 0032 LargeEven set in as diagonally as possible, at least half of that canoe is outside the bed, and while the folded-down tailgate adds about a foot and a half more useful length, it’s still by no means something I’d feel comfortable hauling around without tying it down.

Img 0027 Large

There are good tie-down points, though, both in the floor of the bed and sliding ones along those two side rails. With the canoe secured with a heavy duty cargo strap, I felt comfortable driving the thing all the way to the lake, even though it extended the length of the truck by a solid five or six feet or so.

Img 0029 Large

You had to be especially aware of your long tail while driving, and I can’t say it’s ideal, but I can say it did work. I got there just fine, nothing flew out of the bed, and the Maverick did perform its truckly functions. I think this would essentially be the same situation for any really large object you might try to haul in a Maverick.

It’s not great, and definitely takes more prep to make it actually work, but it did basically work.

But it could be better. A lot better. And I think I know how.

The Maverick Needs A Midgate

Of all the vehicles currently on the market today, I can’t think of any that would be as drastically improved with the addition of a midgate than the Ford Maverick. You remember what a midgate is, right? Of course you do. But, in case someone is reading over your shoulder, I’ll remind you. A midgate is an opening panel on the back part of a truck or truck-like vehicle’s cab that extends the bed space into the cab. The Chevy Avalanche is a well-known truck with a midgate; here’s a picture of what it looks like from inside an Avalanche with the midgate open:

Screen Shot 2024 03 13 At 10.41.02 Am

For the Maverick, I think the rear window can stay intact and just a lower midgate would be fine, which could be accessed by folding the rear seatbacks forward, much like you do when folding a back seat down to gain access to a car’s trunk.

Midgate Maverick

With a midgate, the Maverick’s bed could be extended by several very useful feet, at the temporary cost of the rear seat passenger accommodation, but since most long-bed pickups don’t have back seats anyway, this hardly seems like a big drawback. The extra flexibility offered would be considerable, as the short bed could be easily transformed into a longer bed with the simple act of folding down the rear seat.

This is hardly rocket science; remember, the Subaru Baja had one of these, along with the Japan-only Toyota Bb Open Deck, the pickup truck version of the Scion xB. And these were both similar unibody sorts of designs, there’s no reason this type of midgate couldn’t be incorporated into the Maverick.

So, to recap, if you’re looking at the Ford Maverick in terms of its abilities as a truck, I’d say for common truck-requiring duties, it can perform reasonably, but it is hampered in its ability to haul really large, especially long, things easily and comfortably. If the Maverick had a midgate, its utility could be improved quite dramatically, though.

And, regardless, the Maverick is still an excellent and inexpensive do-whatever sort of vehicle, the kind of thing that should be considered if you’re just looking for decent, cheap, basic transportation, not even necessarily a truck.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ford, if you’d like me to Sawzall a midgate into the next press Maverick you send my way, just shoot me a DM, okay? Great!

[Ed note: I feel like there’s a much simpler solution to this:

Yakimacanoecarrier

Ford sells this Yakima Rack that seems like it would entirely get the job done… Just saying! – MH]

Ford Recalls Nearly 500,000 SUVs and Trucks Due to Battery Issue

Overview of the Recall

Identified Battery Problem

Ford Motor Company has announced a recall for nearly 500,000 SUVs and pickup trucks due to a significant battery detection issue. This problem affects certain Bronco Sport SUVs and Maverick trucks, which might not detect low battery levels. Such a failure can result in the engine and electrical systems losing power during operation, creating a notable safety hazard.

Models Affected and Recall Scope

The recall includes specific models from the 2021 to 2024 Bronco Sport SUVs and the 2022 to 2023 Maverick trucks, as reported by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). It is imperative for owners of these vehicles to take prompt action to address the potential risks.

Instructions for Vehicle Owners

Solution and Contact Information

Owners are advised to contact Ford customer service at 1-866-436-7332 and reference the recall number 24S24. It is crucial for those with affected vehicles to get in touch with their Ford dealer immediately.

Notification and Repair Process

Ford will begin mailing notification letters to owners starting May 13. Dealers will recalibrate the body control module and powertrain control module at no charge. For more details, owners can contact the NHTSA Vehicle Safety Hotline at 1-888-327-4236 (TTY 1-800-424-9153) or visit the NHTSA website at www.nhtsa.gov for additional information.

Price Wars: Ford Ranger Raptor vs. Toyota Tacoma TRD Pro – A Cost-Benefit Analysis

Cost Advantage: Ford Ranger Raptor

The 2024 Ford Ranger Raptor emerges as a more budget-friendly contender in the off-road truck segment, offering a significant price benefit over the Toyota Tacoma TRD Pro. With a starting price of $57,065, including destination fees, the Ranger Raptor is almost $10,000 cheaper than its counterpart, the Tacoma, which is tagged at $66,890 including fees. This price disparity makes the Ranger Raptor an attractive option for buyers looking for high performance without the hefty price.

Shifting Market Dynamics Favor the Ford Ranger Raptor

Traditionally dominated by the Toyota Tacoma, the mid-size truck sector is witnessing a shift with the entry of the competitively priced Ford Ranger Raptor. This shift not only challenges the Tacoma’s long-standing market leadership but also introduces a cost-effective alternative for truck enthusiasts. The Tacoma’s higher price point now positions the Ranger Raptor as a formidable competitor offering substantial value.

Comparative Performance and Off-Road Capabilities

Both the Ford Ranger Raptor and the Toyota Tacoma TRD Pro are designed to excel in off-road conditions, equipped with advanced technologies and powerful engines. The Ranger Raptor boasts a turbocharged 3.0-liter V6 engine, which produces 405 horsepower and 430 lb-ft of torque, outperforming the Tacoma TRD Pro’s hybrid setup that delivers 325 horsepower and 465 lb-ft of torque. This difference in power and the immediate torque response from the Tacoma’s hybrid system highlight each vehicle’s unique approach to balancing performance and efficiency.

The 2024 Ford Ranger Raptor jumping in the desert
2024 Ford Ranger Raptor | Ford

Enhanced Insights and Benefits

Financial Implications of Lower Cost

Opting for the Ford Ranger Raptor could lead to considerable savings for consumers, which could alternatively be used for vehicle customization or saved for other expenses. This financial advantage underscores the Ranger Raptor’s appeal as an economically wise choice without compromising on the expected off-road functionality.

Off-Road Technology and Design

Each truck is outfitted with state-of-the-art off-road tech, including electronically locking differentials and specially tuned Fox shocks, poised to tackle tough terrain with ease. While both models feature 33-inch tires, the Ranger Raptor offers 10.7 inches of ground clearance compared to the Tacoma’s 11.0 inches, slightly edging out in terms of underbody protection.

Interior Comfort and Ergonomic Design

Inside, the Ford Ranger Raptor and Toyota Tacoma TRD Pro cater to off-road comfort with distinct seating solutions designed to support the driver and passengers in rugged conditions. The Ranger Raptor is equipped with supportive bucket seats, whereas the Tacoma opts for isodynamic seating to enhance stability and comfort, proving that both models prioritize ergonomics to enhance the overall driving experience.

In conclusion, the Ford Ranger Raptor’s significant price advantage coupled with its robust features and performance makes it a compelling choice for potential buyers, challenging the Toyota Tacoma TRD Pro’s dominance in the market with a blend of affordability and capability.

Shared Transmission Troubles: The Costly Issue Impacting Ford F-150 and Chevy Silverado

Common Ground in Transmission Woes

The Ford F-150 and Chevy Silverado 1500, two of America’s best-selling trucks, are unexpectedly united by a shared defect in their transmissions, leading to numerous lawsuits. Both models are equipped with a jointly developed 10-speed automatic transmission that has become the source of frustration for many owners. This similarity in hardware has led to comparable legal challenges for both Ford and Chevrolet.

Details of the Transmission Defect

This specific transmission problem involves the 10L80 model used in the Chevy Silverado and the 10R80 in the Ford F-150. Owners of these trucks have reported issues such as harsh shifting, unexpected power losses, failure to change gears, unsettling noises, and erratic gear slips. The frequency of these complaints has been higher for the F-150, which aligns with its higher sales figures compared to the Silverado.

The Legal and Repair Landscape

Despite the mounting complaints and class-action lawsuits urging Ford and Chevy to address these defects, neither manufacturer has issued a recall. Technical service bulletins have been issued in attempts to remedy the issues, but both automakers maintain that these transmission behaviors are within normal operational standards. Yet, for drivers, these issues translate to a driving experience that feels both uncomfortable and unsafe, with potential repair costs exceeding $3,500.

The 2024 Chevy Silverado on the road
2024 Chevy Silverado 1500 | Chevrolet

Added Factual and Beneficial Information:

Economic Impact of Transmission Failures

The transmission problems with the Ford F-150 and Chevy Silverado not only affect vehicle performance but also impose significant financial burdens on owners. The cost of replacing such a complex component can severely impact an owner’s finances, highlighting the need for manufacturers to ensure more robust and reliable transmission designs in future models.

Consumer Trust and Manufacturer Responsibility

Persistent issues like these can erode consumer trust in major brands like Ford and Chevy. It underscores the importance of automakers conducting rigorous quality checks before releasing vehicles to the market. Ensuring the reliability of critical components such as transmissions is essential for maintaining brand reputation and consumer satisfaction.

Advocacy and Future Directions

This situation illustrates the critical role of consumer advocacy and legal actions in holding manufacturers accountable. As owners of affected models band together to seek justice, it could prompt industry-wide changes, leading to higher standards and better consumer protections in automotive manufacturing. Moving forward, it’s vital for vehicle owners to stay informed and proactive in addressing any signs of vehicle malfunction.